What is the impact of the Montreal Convention on the legal liability of parties other than airlines?

• A. It increases liability for manufacturers and operators.
• B. It restricts liability only to the airline.
• C. It allows multiple parties to be held liable.
• D. It establishes equal liability among all parties.

Answer: (B)

The correct answer reflects the specific framework established by the Montreal Convention, which primarily focuses on the liability of airlines in cases of passenger injury, baggage loss, or damage. Under the Montreal Convention, the liability of airlines is limited and structured to facilitate uniformity and predictability for international air travel.

The Convention allows for airline liability but does not extend automatic liability to other parties, such as manufacturers or airport operators, unless specific conditions or legal principles dictate their responsibility. Thus, by effectively concentrating liability on airlines, the Montreal Convention simplifies legal proceedings for passengers, who can claim damages primarily from the airline involved in the transportation.

In this context, options that suggest increased liability for other entities (like manufacturers or operators) or equal liability among multiple parties misinterpret the Convention's intent and framework. The focus is unmistakably on airline liability, which is foundational to the structure of liability in international air transport under the Convention.